Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:38:49 GMT -5
In this respect, in the incident where the wedding invitation was printed, the wedding hall was rented and the plaintiff was accused of immorality and humiliated by showing that the reason for breaking off the engagement 9 days before the wedding was that he went to have tea with a widow after work, it was not correct to reject the decision, although compensation should have been awarded, since there were conditions for moral compensation. It required breaking.” (Supreme Court 3rd HD, 26.04.2018, 2016/17785 E., 2018/4632 K.). the parties were investigated, the plaintiff was born in 1983 and did not work, was a housewife, stayed with her sister with her child born on 13.01.2011 from her relationship with the defendant, had no income and was supported by her sister and brother-in-law, and the defendant was born in 1981 and earned minimum wage as a marketer.
It has been determined that he was working and France Telegram Number Data married someone else on 31.12.2010... In this case, considering the date of the incident, the way it occurred, the state of fault, the degree of being affected by the incident, the characteristics of the incident, the economic facts and the above principles, the amount of 60,000 TL non-pecuniary damage assessed by the court will compensate for the disturbed balance to some extent. In this respect, in the incident where the wedding invitation was printed, the wedding hall was rented and the plaintiff was accused of immorality and humiliated by showing that the reason for breaking off the engagement 9 days before the wedding was that he went to have tea with a widow after work, it was not correct to reject the decision, although compensation should have been awarded, since there were conditions for moral compensation. It required breaking.”
Supreme Court 3rd HD, 26.04.2018, 2016/17785 E., 2018/4632 K.). The social and economic situations of the parties were investigated, the plaintiff was born in 1983 and did not work, was a housewife, stayed with her sister with her child born on 13.01.2011 from her relationship with the defendant, had no income and was supported by her sister and brother-in-law, and the defendant was born in 1981 and earned minimum wage as a marketer. It has been determined that he was working and married someone else on 31.12.2010... In this case, considering the date of the incident, the way it occurred, the state of fault, the degree of being affected by the incident, the characteristics of the incident, the economic facts and the above principles, the amount of 60,000 TL non-pecuniary damage assessed by the court will compensate for the disturbed balance to some extent.
It has been determined that he was working and France Telegram Number Data married someone else on 31.12.2010... In this case, considering the date of the incident, the way it occurred, the state of fault, the degree of being affected by the incident, the characteristics of the incident, the economic facts and the above principles, the amount of 60,000 TL non-pecuniary damage assessed by the court will compensate for the disturbed balance to some extent. In this respect, in the incident where the wedding invitation was printed, the wedding hall was rented and the plaintiff was accused of immorality and humiliated by showing that the reason for breaking off the engagement 9 days before the wedding was that he went to have tea with a widow after work, it was not correct to reject the decision, although compensation should have been awarded, since there were conditions for moral compensation. It required breaking.”
Supreme Court 3rd HD, 26.04.2018, 2016/17785 E., 2018/4632 K.). The social and economic situations of the parties were investigated, the plaintiff was born in 1983 and did not work, was a housewife, stayed with her sister with her child born on 13.01.2011 from her relationship with the defendant, had no income and was supported by her sister and brother-in-law, and the defendant was born in 1981 and earned minimum wage as a marketer. It has been determined that he was working and married someone else on 31.12.2010... In this case, considering the date of the incident, the way it occurred, the state of fault, the degree of being affected by the incident, the characteristics of the incident, the economic facts and the above principles, the amount of 60,000 TL non-pecuniary damage assessed by the court will compensate for the disturbed balance to some extent.